Revolutionary app page software for Public Sector Unions

In June 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Janus v. AFSCME that all workers employed by a government entity, no matter their location in the U.S., have right-to-work protections. As a result, these workers cannot be forced to financially support a labor union in order to hold a government job.

No public-sector employees who have refused membership in trade unions may be compelled to pay union dues to said unions because of the benefits that they may receive from their collective bargaining.

UnionConnect puts the information that is important to each member at their fingertips. Your locals members no longer need to hunt through their locals website to find what they are looking for.

If you choose to opt out of your union you cannot be denied any benefits under the labor contract with your organization because of your decision. You have the power to decide whether union membership is right for you without fear of retaliation by a union or employer.

In the case, Janus vs. AFSCME, the US Supreme Court restored the First Amendment rights of millions of public sector employeesgiving them a voice and a choice when it comes to union membership. The decision will force unions to better represent workers and their interests in order to prevent membership decline.

In Janus, the Supreme Court held that only the maker of a statementone who has ultimate authority over the statements content and whether to communicate itcan be liable for violations of subsection (b) of Rule 10b-5.

For members, Union Strong is the easiest way to stay up to date with your union; get the latest news, events, and critical information. Receive push notifications.

Public Unions vs. Public and private unions also differ in who they bargain with. Where a private union will bargain with an employer, a public union needs to bargain with state and local legislators.